25-, 23-, or 20-gauge instrumentation for vitreous surgery?

55Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To discuss the evolution and current status of 25-, 23-, and 20-gauge vitrectomy instrumentation. Methods: Literature review. Results: There are multiple small case series describing the surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications associated with 25- and 23-gauge vitrectomy. These studies suggest that small-gauge vitrectomy may shorten operating time, improve patient comfort, and speed visual recovery. However, increased complication rates involving hypotony and endophthalmitis have been reported. There are no level 1 evidence-based studies comparing the efficacy and safety of 25-, 23-, and 20-gauge vitrectomy. Conclusion: 25- and 23-gauge vitrectomy techniques may shorten operating time, improve patient comfort, and speed visual recovery. However, larger and better designed evidence-based studies are required to better understand relative values of 25-, 23-, and 20-gauge vitrectomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, G. A. (2008). 25-, 23-, or 20-gauge instrumentation for vitreous surgery? In Eye (Vol. 22, pp. 1263–1266). Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free