For upper ureteral stone, semirigid ureteroscopy or flexible ureteroscopy? Strengths and weaknesses

9Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Flexible and semirigid ureteroscopy are two often used modalities in treating for upper ureteral stone. How about the outcome of each procedure? Methods: A retrospective cohort study among 167 patients who underwent flexible or semirigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy was performed. The pre-, intra-, postoperative and one-year follow-up outcomes were taken into comparison. Results: Significantly higher instant stone-clearance rate (81.3% vs. 92.4%, p =.032) and less operative time (62.1 ± 27.6 min vs. 44.1 ± 24.6 min, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, W., Wan, W., Yang, J., Amier, Y., Li, X., Zhang, J., & Yu, X. (2024). For upper ureteral stone, semirigid ureteroscopy or flexible ureteroscopy? Strengths and weaknesses. BMC Urology, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01647-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free