Association between diet quality and all-cause mortality in a large Dutch cohort

3Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Food-based dietary guidelines are helpful for governments and health agencies to encourage healthy eating at the population level. In order to assess adherence to such guidelines, index scores have been developed, the version in the Netherlands being the Dutch Healthy Diet-index (2015) (DHD2015-index), which reflect adherence to the 2015 Dutch dietary guidelines. Because a higher diet quality, i.e. a higher adherence to the dietary guidelines, is associated with better health outcomes, a higher DHD2015-index score would also mean better outcomes on measures of health, such as all-cause mortality. The present study aimed to elucidate this by investigating the association between DHD2015-index score and mortality in the Dutch population using data from 97 999 participants in the Lifelines cohort study. For the analyses, Cox Proportional Hazards regression was used, whilst accounting for age, sex, physiological measurements, exercise, and biochemical and lifestyle variables. There was a strong negative association between DHD2015-index score and mortality. Hazard ratios for DHD2015-index scores below 60 were approximately 1.2x larger than the mean. Every 10 unit increase in DHD2015-index scores between 60 and 90 led to a 0.1 reduction in hazard ratio, and every 10 unit increase between 90 and the highest DHD2015-index scores led to a reduction in hazard ratios of 0.05. The hazard ratio for the lowest quartile of DHD2015-index scores was 1.14 (95% CI = 1.04–1.26), whereas that for the highest quartile was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.84–0.92). Our results show a clear inverse relationship between DHD2015-index score and all-cause mortality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kirk, D., Baart, A. M., McLean, J., & Feskens, E. J. M. (2024). Association between diet quality and all-cause mortality in a large Dutch cohort. PLoS ONE, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302905

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free