Detecting hypertension: Screening versus case finding in Norway

33Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective - Evaluation of detection of hypertension in adults in the county of Nord-Trondelag, Norway. Design - Cross sectional survey with clinical follow up examinations. Setting - Health survey by screening teams from the national health screening service, and examinations by all 106 general practitioners in the county. Subjects - During 1984-6, 74,977 persons (88.1% of those aged 20 years and over) participated in the health survey. Main outcome measures - Hypertension (when assessed by standardised recording and by questionnaires on drug treatment for hypertension) according to the blood pressure thresholds used in the Norwegian treatment programme. Subjects positive on screening were grouped after clinical examination into treatment groups. Results - In all, 2,399 subjects were positive for hypertension. Before screening 6,210 (8.3%) patients reported taking antihypertensive drugs and another 3,849 (5.1%) had their blood pressure monitored regularly. All who screened positive were referred to their general practitioner and evaluated according to a standard programme. As a result, drug treatment was started in 406 (0.5%) participants screened and blood pressure monitoring in another 1,007 (1.3%). Of all patients taking antihypertensive drugs after the screening, 6,399 (94.0%) had been diagnosed before screening, and of those whose blood pressure was monitored after the screening, 79.3% had been diagnosed before screening. Conclusions - At the blood pressure screening thresholds used, and when hypertension is defined by an overall clinical diagnosis, the results indicate that general practitioners can find and diagnose hypertensive patients with the case finding strategy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holmen, J., Forsen, L., Hjort, P. F., Midthjell, K., Waaler Th., H., & Bjorndal, A. (1991). Detecting hypertension: Screening versus case finding in Norway. British Medical Journal, 302(6770), 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.302.6770.219

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free