Artistic expression as interpretation

11Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

According to R. G. Collingwood in The Principles of Art, art is the expression of emotion - a muchcriticized view. I attempt to provide some groundwork for a defensible modern version of such a theory via some novel further criticisms of Collingwood, including the exposure of multiple ambiguities in his main concept of expression of emotion, and a demonstration that, surprisingly enough, his view is unable to account for genuinely creative artistic activities. A key factor in the reconstruction is a replacement of the concept of expression with that of interpretation: what artists do is to interpret, rather than express, their initial emotions, in creative ways that may go far beyond their initial impulses. Thus more broadly the paper attempts to show that the concept of interpretation is just as central to understanding artistic creativity as it is in the analysis of the critical appreciation of artworks. © British Society of Aesthetics 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dilworth, J. (2004). Artistic expression as interpretation. British Journal of Aesthetics, 44(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/44.1.10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free