Internal pore measurements on macroperforate planktonic Foraminifera as an alternative morphometric approach

10Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Because of the lack of genetic control on extinct species, the morphologic approach remains the only way of identifying fossil Foraminifera. In addition to comparative description of gross shell morphology, morphometry became more important in recent years and was extended to encompass the ultrastructure of the shells. In particular, some studies focused on porosity, as determined by the pore diameters plotted against the number of pores per given surface. However, taking into account the poor preservation and recrystallization, which often affects and characterizes fossil specimens, and/or the deficiencies connected to the interpretation of scanning electron microscope images, pore measurements are often distorted, limited in number and lacking precision, and thus unreliable. We demonstrate that, by measuring the pores from inside the shell and individually, it is possible to obtain numerous and precise data either on an individual basis or for statistical purposes. This study also suggests that in the Early Miocene Globigerinoides, which is generally strongly susceptible for dissolution, the dissolution proceeds from the external towards the internal side of the shell. © 2013 Swiss Geological Society.

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Planktic foraminifers in the modern ocean

321Citations
246Readers
Get full text
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Constandache, M., Yerly, F., & Spezzaferri, S. (2013). Internal pore measurements on macroperforate planktonic Foraminifera as an alternative morphometric approach. Swiss Journal of Geosciences, 106(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00015-013-0134-8

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Researcher 4

44%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 7

70%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

10%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

10%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0