Missing data in clinical studies: Issues and methods

166Citations
Citations of this article
184Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Missing data are a prevailing problem in any type of data analyses. A participant variable is considered missing if the value of the variable (outcome or covariate) for the participant is not observed. In this article, various issues in analyzing studies with missing data are discussed. Particularly, we focus on missing response and/or covariate data for studies with discrete, continuous, or time-to-event end points in which generalized linear models, models for longitudinal data such as generalized linear mixed effects models, or Cox regression models are used. We discuss various classifications of missing data that may arise in a study and demonstrate in several situations that the commonly used method of throwing out all participants with any missing data may lead to incorrect results and conclusions. The methods described are applied to data from an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group phase II clinical trial of liver cancer and a phase III clinical trial of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Although the main area of application discussed here is cancer, the issues and methods we discuss apply to any type of study. © 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ibrahim, J. G., Chu, H., & Chen, M. H. (2012, September 10). Missing data in clinical studies: Issues and methods. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.7589

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free