Student Success and Failure: As a matter of fact or just how they are portrayed?

  • Gale T
  • Densmore K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper introduces and analyses three broad discourses of academic achievement and failure, specifically those that speak of students' deficits, disadvantages and differences. It draws on interview data collected from teachers working in Australian primary (elementary) and secondary (high) schools and on academic literature that speaks to the field. The paper argues that 'deficit', 'disadvantage' and 'difference' represent discourses of considerable influence in determining how teachers, students and parents define what constitutes success or failure in schools, which respective approaches educators employ, and the beliefs that are held about students who fail and those who succeed. In this respect, the paper is concerned with matters of inclusion and exclusion in schooling. In particular, the authors seek to tease out the stories that these discourses tell about student diversity, as a way of unmasking how students are differently represented and how these representations serve to include some and exclude others from the benefits of schooling and society more broadly. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gale, T., & Densmore, K. (2002). Student Success and Failure: As a matter of fact or just how they are portrayed? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660120114940

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free