Pathology update to the Manchester Scoring System based on testing in over 4000 families

52Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background While the requirement for thresholds for testing for mutations in BRCA1/2 is being questioned, they are likely to remain for individuals unaffected by a relevant cancer. It is still useful to provide pretesting likelihoods, but models need to take into account tumour pathology. Methods The Manchester Scoring System (MSS) is a well-used, simple, paper-based model for assessing carrier probability that already incorporates pathology data. We have used mutation testing data from 4115 unrelated samples from affected non-Jewish individuals alongside tumour pathology to further refine the scoring system. Results Adding additional points for high-grade serous ovarian cancer <60 (HGSOC=+2) and adding grade score to those with triple-negative breast cancer, while reducing the score for those with HER2+ breast cancer (-6), resulted in significantly improved sensitivity and minor improvements in specificity to the MSS. Sporadic HGSOC <60 years thus reached a score of 15-19 points within the 10% grouping consistent with the 15/113-13.2% that were identified with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant. Validation in a population series of ovarian cancer from Cambridge showed high sensitivity at the 10% threshold 15/17 (88.2%). Conclusions The new pathology-adjusted Manchester score MSS3 appears to provide an effective and simpleto- use estimate of the 10% and 20% thresholds for BRCA1/2 likelihood. For unaffected individuals, the 20-point (20%) threshold in their affected first-degree relative can be used to determine eligibility at the 10% threshold.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Evans, D. G., Harkness, E. F., Plaskocinska, I., Wallace, A. J., Clancy, T., Woodward, E. R., … Lalloo, F. (2017). Pathology update to the Manchester Scoring System based on testing in over 4000 families. Journal of Medical Genetics, 54(10), 674–681. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104584

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free