Abstract
The authors explored two methodological issues in the estimation of smoking-attributable mortality for the United States. First, age-specific and age-adjusted relative risk, attributable fraction, and smoking-attributable mortality estimates obtained using data from the American Cancer Society's second Cancer Prevention Study (CPS II), a cohort study of 1.2 million participants (1982-1988), were compared with those obtained using a combination of data from the National Mortality Follow-back Survey (NMFS), a representative sample of US decedents in which information was collected from informants (1986), and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a nationally representative household survey (1987). Second, the potential for residual confounding of the disease-specific age-adjusted smoking-attributable mortality estimates was addressed with a model-based approach. The estimated smoking-attributable mortality based on the CPS II for the four most common smoking-related diseases - lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease, and cerebrovascular disease - was 19% larger than the estimated smoking-attributable mortality based on the NMFS/NHIS, yet the two data sources yielded essentially the same smoking-attributable mortality estimate for lung cancer alone. Further adjustment of smoking-attributable mortality for disease-appropriate confounding factors (education, alcohol intake, hypertension status, and diabetes status) indicated little residual confounding once age was taken into account.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Malarcher, A. M., Schulman, J., Epstein, L. A., Thun, M. J., Mowery, P., Pierce, B., … Giovino, G. A. (2000). Methodological issues in estimating smoking-attributable mortality in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology, 152(6), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/152.6.573
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.