An evaluation of non-Luer safety connectors for neuraxial procedures

11Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We evaluated seven non-Luer spinal needles in a two-part study. In part 1, we measured the time to see and collect simulated cerebrospinal fluid. In part 2, clinicians scored needle quality using a standardised questionnaire. The mean (SD) times to see cerebrospinal fluid varied in the lateral position from 4.2 (0.3) s (Vygon) to 25.2 (1.5) s (Sarstedt), and in the sitting position from 1.7 (0.2) s (BBraun) to 6.6 (0.3) s (Sarstedt). The time to collect cerebrospinal fluid varied from 43 (2.5) s (Vygon) to 139 (9.6) s (Pajunk) and from 19 (0.4) s (BBraun) to 34 (1.7) s (Pajunk), for the lateral and sitting positions, respectively. Median (IQR [range]) satisfaction scores in 205 needle function assessments were as follows: Sarstedt 9.0 (8.0-9.3 [5.0-10.0]); BD 8.0 (7.0-9.5 [3.0-10.0]); Pajunk 9.0 (8.0-9.8 [5.0-10.0]); Neurax 8.0 (7.0-9.0 [2.0-9.0]); Smiths 8.0 (7.0-9.0 [4.0-10.0]); Vygon 8.0 (7.5-9.0 [5.0-10.0]); and BBraun 9.0 (9.0-10.0 [7.0-10.0]). The difference in satisfaction scores between the BBraun and Neurax was significant (p < 0.01). A number of recurrent problems were found during the evaluation. The variation in time to collect cerebrospinal fluid samples may have implications for non-anaesthetic practice. This evaluation provides a baseline to assist others in commencing their procurement process. © 2013 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharpe, P., Scott, S., & Gross, J. M. (2013). An evaluation of non-Luer safety connectors for neuraxial procedures. Anaesthesia, 68(6), 562–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12228

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free