Trajectories of Follow-up Compliance in a Fracture Liaison Service and Their Predictors: A Longitudinal Group-Based Trajectory Analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction/Objectives: Identification of groups of patients following similar trajectories of time-varying patient characteristics are often of considerable clinical value. This study provides an example of how the identification of trajectory groups of patients can be useful. Methods: Using clinical and administrative data of a prospective cohort study aiming to improve the secondary prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures with a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS), trajectory groups for visit compliance over time (2-year follow-up) were predicted using group-based trajectory modeling. Predictors of trajectory groups were identified using multinomial logistic regressions. Results: Among 532 participants (86% women, mean age 63 years), three trajectories were identified and interpreted as high followers, intermediate followers, and low followers. The predicted probability for group-membership was: 48.4% high followers, 28.1% intermediate followers, 23.5% low followers. A lower femoral bone mineral density and polypharmacy were predictors of being in the high followers compared to the low followers group; predictors for being in the intermediate followers group were polypharmacy and referral to a bone specialist at baseline. Conclusions: Results provided information on visit compliance patterns and predictors for the patients undergoing the intervention. This information has important implications when implementing such health services and determining their effectiveness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Senay, A., Fernandes, J. C., Delisle, J., Morin, S. N., Nagin, D., & Perreault, S. (2021). Trajectories of Follow-up Compliance in a Fracture Liaison Service and Their Predictors: A Longitudinal Group-Based Trajectory Analysis. Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928211047024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free