Plastic Buckling Paradox: An Updated Review

16Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is widely accepted that the flow theory of plasticity significantly overestimates buckling stresses and strains and, in some cases, fails to predict buckling at all, while the deformation theory, which lacks physical rigor compared to the flow theory, predicts results that are in better agreement with experimental ones. The deformation theory is therefore recommended for use in practical applications of the buckling of shells. This paper aims to review in detail the causes behind the seeming discrepancies in the results predicted by both the flow and deformation theories of plasticity, and to propose an explanation for this so-called “plastic buckling paradox” on the basis of some recent research work in the field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shamass, R. (2020, April 23). Plastic Buckling Paradox: An Updated Review. Frontiers in Built Environment. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free