Shocking stuff: Technology, hours, and factor substitution

33Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The response of hours to technology shocks is a key controversy in macroeconomics. We show that differences between RBC and NK models hinge on highly restrictive views of technology. We introduce CES production technologies and demonstrate that the response of hours depends on the factor-augmenting nature of shocks and the capital-labor substitution elasticity in both models. We develop analytical expressions to establish the thresholds determining its sign. This opens new margins for shock identification combining theory and VAR evidence. We discuss how our models provide new robust restrictions for empirical work, especially using the labor income share. © 2014 by the European Economic Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cantore, C., León-Ledesma, M., Mcadam, P., & Willman, A. (2014). Shocking stuff: Technology, hours, and factor substitution. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12038

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free