Temporal trends in mode, site and stage of presentation with the introduction of colorectal cancer screening: A decade of experience from the West of Scotland

32Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Population colorectal cancer screening programmes have been introduced to reduce cancer-specific mortality through the detection of early-stage disease. The present study aimed to examine the impact of screening introduction in the West of Scotland.Methods: Data on all patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer between January 2003 and December 2012 were extracted from a prospectively maintained regional audit database. Changes in mode, site and stage of presentation before, during and after screening introduction were examined.Results: In a population of 2.4 million, over a 10-year period, 14 487 incident cases of colorectal cancer were noted. Of these, 7827 (54%) were males and 7727 (53%) were socioeconomically deprived. In the postscreening era, 18% were diagnosed via the screening programme. There was a reduction in both emergency presentation (20% prescreening vs 13% postscreening, P≤0.001) and the proportion of rectal cancers (34% prescreening vs 31% pos-screening, P≤0.001) over the timeframe. Within non-metastatic disease, an increase in the proportion of stage I tumours at diagnosis was noted (17% prescreening vs 28% postscreening, P≤0.001).Conclusions: Within non-metastatic disease, a shift towards earlier stage at diagnosis has accompanied the introduction of a national screening programme. Such a change should lead to improved outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mansouri, D., McMillan, D. C., Crearie, C., Morrison, D. S., Crighton, E. M., & Horgan, P. G. (2015). Temporal trends in mode, site and stage of presentation with the introduction of colorectal cancer screening: A decade of experience from the West of Scotland. British Journal of Cancer, 113(3), 556–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.230

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free