Race, community disadvantage, and cognitive decline: Findings from KHANDLE and STAR

4Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Community disadvantage is associated with late-life cognition. Few studies examine its contribution to racial disparities in cognition/cognitive change. METHODS: Inverse probability weighted models estimated expected mean differences in cognition/cognitive change attributed to residing in less advantaged communities, defined as cohort top quintile of Area Deprivation Indices (ADI): childhood 66–100; adulthood ADI 5-99). Interactions by race tested. RESULTS: More Black participants resided in less advantaged communities. Semantic memory would be lower if all participants had resided in less advantaged childhood (b = -0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.30, -0.03) or adulthood (b = -0.14, 95% CI = -0.22, -0.04) communities. Race interactions indicated that, among Black participants, less advantaged childhood communities were associated with higher verbal episodic memory (interaction p-value = 0.007) and less advantaged adulthood communities were associated with lower semantic memory (interaction p-value = 0.002). DISCUSSION: Examining racial differences in levels of community advantage and late-life cognitive decline is a critical step toward unpacking community effects on cognitive disparities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peterson, R. L., Pejak, R., George, K. M., Gilsanz, P., Ko, M., Meyer, O. L., … Whitmer, R. A. (2024). Race, community disadvantage, and cognitive decline: Findings from KHANDLE and STAR. Alzheimer’s and Dementia, 20(2), 904–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.13511

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free