Abstract
The purpose of this secondary analysis was to assess whether students’ use of stand-biased desks during the school day influenced physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviors (SB) during the afterschool period. By using a crossover design consisting of two 9-week intervention periods, 99 participants from grades 3, 4, and 6 were randomly assigned by their teacher to either a traditional (Group 1; sit–stand) or stand-biased (Group 2; stand–sit) desk in the classroom. The desk type then switched between intervention periods. Afterschool PA and SB were measured by accelerometry at baseline (fall) and following both intervention periods at post I (winter) and post II (spring). Independent sample t-tests and mixed-effects modeling were applied at a significance value of p < 0.05 to detect differences between groups. No significant differences in afterschool SB, light-intensity PA (LPA), or moderate-to vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA) were found between groups. There were also no significant two-or three-way interaction effects detected between desk assignment, time, and afterschool SB, LPA, or MVPA. Stand-biased desks in the classroom were not detrimental to children’s afterschool PA and SB.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Tokarek, N. R., Cho, C. C., Strath, S. J., & Swartz, A. M. (2022). The Impact of Stand-Biased Desks on Afterschool Physical Activity Behaviors of Elementary School Children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137689
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.