Abstract
Objectives The management of asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) is controversial. We perform a meta-analysis of reconstructed individual patient data to compare conservative treatment versus transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR) in asymptomatic AS. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL were systematically searched, through 25th September 2025, to identify any observational or randomized controlled studies that comply with our inclusion criteria. Our primary outcomes were short cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality as well as long-term mortality. We combined aggregate data meta-analysis for dichotomous outcomes using incidence rate ratio (IRR) with reconstructed time-to-event data derived from published Kaplan–Meier curves using validated algorithms. Results Seventeen studies were included. Overall, AVR was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with conservative management (IRR=0.43; 95% CI, 0.32-0.57; P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Awad, A. K., Badran, A. S., Gonnah, A. R., Helmy, A. E., Awad, A. K., Elbahloul, M. A., … Hameed, I. (2026). Surgical vs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis- an Updated Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Individual Patient Data. Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf308
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.