The burden of cardiovascular disease and cancer attributable to low fruit and vegetable intake in the European Union: differences between old and new Member States

  • Pomerleau J
  • Lock K
  • McKee M
59Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the burden of disease attributable to low fruit and vegetable intake in the 15 countries that were members of the European Union (EU) before May 2004 (EU-15) and the 10 countries that then joined it (EU-10). Design: Data on fruit and vegetable intake, target levels of intake and estimates of relative risks, deaths and disability were combined to obtain the burden of ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic stroke and four types of cancer (lung/bronchus/trachea, stomach, oesophagus, and colon/rectum) attributable to low fruit and vegetable consumption. Setting: EU-15 and EU-10 Member States. Results: The number of lives potentially saved annually from the selected outcomes if fruit and vegetable intake increased to 600 g person-1 day-1 reached 892000 and 423 000 in the EU-15 and EU-10, respectively; total disease burden could decrease by 1.9% and 3-6%, respectively. The burden of ischaemic heart disease and stroke could be reduced by up to 17% and 10%, respectively, in the EU-15 and by 24% and 15%, respectively, in the EU-10; potential reductions for the selected cancers varied from 1% to 12% in the EU-15 and from 2% to 17% in the EU-10. Conclusions: The potential health gain of increased fruit and vegetable intake is particularly large in the new Member States, and particularly high for cardiovascular diseases, a main cause of health divide in Europe. This stresses the need for better nutrition programmes and policies that take account of economic, social and cultural specificities. © The Authors 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pomerleau, J., Lock, K., & McKee, M. (2006). The burden of cardiovascular disease and cancer attributable to low fruit and vegetable intake in the European Union: differences between old and new Member States. Public Health Nutrition, 9(5), 575–583. https://doi.org/10.1079/phn2005910

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free