The Relationship of Critical Thinking According to the Five-Factor Model through Metacognition Mediation: A Path Analysis Model

1Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background & Objective: The development of critical thinking skills, which is hugely affected by personality traits, is always a puzzling educational subject. This study aimed to elaborate the relationship of critical thinking according to the Five-Factor Model (FFM) through metacognition mediation among students of the Aja University of Medical Sciences. Materials and Methods: The sample population of this descriptive-correlational study was 300 students of AJA University of Medical Sciences during the academic year of 2016-2017. A stratified random sampling model used to select the participants. Data was collected by the Traits Personality Questionnaire 5 (TPQue5) developed by Costa & McCrae, Wells' Metacognitions Questionnaire, and Ricketts' Critical Thinking Disposition Questionnaire. Data analyzed by Amos 24 software. Results: A ccording to results, there was a significant relationship among four personality traits (p-value=0.001); there was also a positive correlation among metacognition and five personality traits of "openness to new experiences", "conscientiousness", "extraversion", "agreeableness", and "neuroticism" (p-value=0.001). Results indicated a direct and significant relationship between four personality traits and critical thinking (p- value=0.001). However, no direct correlation was observed between agreeableness and critical thinking through metacognition mediation. Conclusion: This study revealed that personality traits could influence the development of critical thinking in medical sciences students.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohammadimehr, M., & Majidianfard, M. B. (2020). The Relationship of Critical Thinking According to the Five-Factor Model through Metacognition Mediation: A Path Analysis Model. Journal of Medical Education Development, 13(38), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.29252/edcj.13.38.35

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free