Abstract
I adapt the dynamic framework for vagueness of Barker 2002 to the analysis of subjective taste predicates. I argue, following Kennedy 2013, that there are two qualitatively distinct types of subjectivity in natural language, which I call mapping subjectivity and (vague) standards subjectivity, and that the matrix predicate *find* is sensitive to the distinction between them. Novel to the present analysis is the proposal that *find* requires not just a complement that supports mapping subjectivity, but also a context that supports nonvacuous entailments about those scalar mappings. I part ways from Kennedy and from Barker 2013 in treating mapping subjectivity as a fact of the world, unassimilable to the metalinguistic variety of subjectivity associated with vague standards.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Fleisher, N. (2013). The dynamics of subjectivity. Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 23, 276. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v23i0.2679
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.