Does orthostatic testing have any role in the evaluation of the young subject with mild hypertension?: An insight from the HARVEST study

39Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the clinical significance of the blood pressure (BP) reaction to standing in 1029 stage I hypertensives. Office BP was measured six times in the supine position and six times after 2 min of standing. All subjects underwent 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, and measurements of 24-h urinary epinephrine and norepinephrine excretion. Echocardiography was performed in 636 patients. With use of mixture analysis we could single out a population with abnormal diastolic BP response to standing (hyperreactors, n = 95). These subjects had a diastolic BP increase from lying to standing of >11 mm Hg. The other subjects were defined as normoreactors (n = 934). Office systolic BP was similar in the two groups. Diastolic BP was lower (91 ± 6 mm Hg v 95 ± 5 mm Hg, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vriz, O., Soon, G., Lu, H., Weder, A. B., Canali, C., & Palatini, P. (1997). Does orthostatic testing have any role in the evaluation of the young subject with mild hypertension?: An insight from the HARVEST study. American Journal of Hypertension, 10(5 I), 546–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7061(96)00489-X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free