A novel biomonitoring method to detect pyrethroid metabolites in saliva of occupationally exposed workers as a tool for risk assessment

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Saliva is valuable in exposure assessment having been successfully used for drug and environmental pollutant detection, providing a surrogate measure of plasma concentrations. Pyrethroid biomarkers have not previously been assessed in saliva, although are prime candidates for saliva detection. This study’s objectives were to (1) develop a liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) method to quantify six pyrethroid metabolites using gas chromatography/ion trap mass spectrometry and (2) assess its application for an occupationally exposed population. Several solvents and mixing protocols were optimized for metabolite recovery. The optimized method was applied to a population of pest control operators (PCOs) and compared against a urine sample before and after a full workday using pesticides. A questionnaire collected demographic information, occupational history, and occupational and non-occupational exposure data. LLE recoveries ranged from 85–104% and 72–88% for toluene and dichloromethane using slow mixing, and 49–103% for methyl tert-butyl ether by fast mixing. Urinary 3-Phenoxybenzoic acid (3PBA) was detected in 100% of pre- and post-work urine samples. Three PCOs had increased urinary pyrethroid metabolite levels post-work. Salivary 3PBA was present below detection limit in two of the three PCO’s post-work saliva samples, demonstrating that salivary 3PBA could be measured in PCOs after the workday. This study presents preliminary findings of a potential, low-risk biomonitoring technique that may be utilized in future occupational pyrethroid exposure and risk assessment research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wren, M., Robson, M., & Buckley, B. (2024). A novel biomonitoring method to detect pyrethroid metabolites in saliva of occupationally exposed workers as a tool for risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 30(3–4), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2024.2329625

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free