Action interference in simultaneous and proportional myocontrol: Comparing force- A nd electromyography

22Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Myocontrol, that is, control of a prosthesis via muscle signals, is still a surprisingly hard problem. Recent research indicates that surface electromyography (sEMG), the traditional technique used to detect a subject's intent, could proficiently be replaced, or conjoined with, other techniques (multi-modal myocontrol), with the aim to improve both on dexterity and reliability. Objective. In this paper we present an online assessment of multi-modal sEMG and force myography (FMG) targeted at hand and wrist myocontrol. Approach. Twenty sEMG and FMG sensors in total were used to enforce simultaneous and proportional control of hand opening/closing, wrist pronation/supination and wrist flexion/extension of 12 intact subjects. Main results and Significance. We found that FMG yields in general a better performance than sEMG, and that the main drawback of the sEMG array we used is not the inability to perform a desired action, but rather action interference, that is, the undesired concurrent activation of another action. FMG, on the other hand, causes less interference.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nowak, M., Eiband, T., Ramírez, E. R., & Castellini, C. (2020). Action interference in simultaneous and proportional myocontrol: Comparing force- A nd electromyography. Journal of Neural Engineering, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ab7b1e

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free