Pan-Africanism, Participation and Legitimation in the African Governance Architecture

8Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This article examines how contending appeals to pan-Africanism have been central to the (de)legitimation processes that have shaped the trajectory of African regional governance. Such appeals have been used variously to construct and contest the scale, pace and norms constituting continental integration, including its modes of participation. The African Union (AU) remains a site of contestation over the internal legitimation of competing pan-African agendas as well as external legitimation in the face of interested global forces. We draw on relevant scholarly works, policy documents and interviews with AU practitioners to examine the AU's African Governance Architecture as a set of continental agencies, principles and processes claiming to promote a democratic governance agenda premised on pan-African Shared Values and wider participation. We demonstrate how the particular functioning of several nascent participatory innovations under AGA reflects ongoing contestation over the form and function of African regional governance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mickler, D., & Sturman, K. (2021). Pan-Africanism, Participation and Legitimation in the African Governance Architecture. Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(2), 446–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free