Critical care delayed discharge: Good or bad?

8Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

NHS England is to introduce a new Commissioning for Quality and Innovation to reduce delayed discharges from adult critical care to ward-level care. A delayed discharge is greater than 4 h, this occurred in 64.2% of patients in the critical care minimum data set database from Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre from the last five years; 46.3% were delayed between 4 and 24 h and 17.9% were delayed more than 24 h. For those who had a delay in their discharge of greater than 24 h, the data suggests that “sicker” patients ultimately do better, since there was a reduction in expected mortality of 5892 patients to an actual mortality of 5201 patients over the five years. More in depth analysis of this data is necessary to try to identify which patients are more likely to benefit from extending their critical care stay once the need for organ support has abated. The current Commissioning for Quality and Innovation offers a slightly perverse incentive against this cohort of patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilligan, S. (2017). Critical care delayed discharge: Good or bad? Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 18(2), 146–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1751143716678637

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free