Association of markers of bone- and cartilage-degradation with radiological changes at baseline and after 2 years follow-up in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

53Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective. There is a lack of knowledge on factors that reliably can predict radiological changes in patients with AS. We have investigated whether urinary C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I (CTX-I) and type II (CTX-II) collagen, as specific biochemical markers of bone and cartilage degradation, respectively, are associated with radiological damage and progression, and with BMD in patients with AS. Methods. Eighty-three patients with AS [mean (s.d.) age: 50.4 (12) yrs, 65% male, mean (s.d.) disease duration after diagnosis: 16.7 (10) yrs] who participate in an ongoing cohort study of patients with AS [Outcome in AS International Study (OASIS) cohort] were assessed for urinary CTX-I and -II. Results of both biochemical markers were compared with baseline scores for radiological damage (modified modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score, primarily reflecting syndesmophyte-formation and -growth), and with scores for radiological progression after 2 yrs follow-up. Markers were also associated with disease activity parameters and BMD. Results. Mean duration of complaints was 28.6 yrs. At that time, 54% of patients had signs of radiological damage, and 35% of them showed radiological progression after 2 yrs. Baseline radiological damage (ρ = 0.24; P ≤ 0.05) correlated with CTX-II, but not with CTX-I. CTX-II correlated with serological markers of inflammation (ESR ρ = 0.29 and CRP ρ = 0.30; P ≤ 0.01), but not with baseline BASDAI or BMD. There was a negative correlation between CTX-I and BMD of the trochanter (ρ = -0.31; P ≤ 0.01) In multivariate analyses, CTX-II significantly and independently contributed to explaining variation in radiological damage (standardized β = 0.27; P = 0.03) and progression (standardized β = 0.27; P = 0.05). Conclusion. In AS, cartilage degradation plays a role in explaining radiological-damage and -progression in the spine. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vosse, D., Landewé, R., Garnero, P., van der Heijde, D., van der Linden, S., & Geusens, P. (2008). Association of markers of bone- and cartilage-degradation with radiological changes at baseline and after 2 years follow-up in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology, 47(8), 1219–1222. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ken148

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free