Endoscopy

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The endoscopic evaluation of the patient with colorectal complaints forms the keystone of the physical examination. These examinations allow for the visualization of the entire intestinal tract and include anoscopy, proctoscopy, and colonoscopy as well as PillCam endoscopy. The indications for performing a colonoscopy are multiple, yet there is debate regarding the appropriateness of performing the procedure in some clinical scenarios. The bowel prep is of critical importance in order to adequately examine the entire colon, with inadequate cleaning reported in up to 27 % of patients. Splitting the timing of the prep into one half the day prior to and half the day of the procedure results in a better prep results. There are several adjunctive maneuvers employed with endoscopy that often serve as the markers between seasoned experts and novices. There are alternate techniques, as well, including CO2 insufflation, Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) endoscopy, and chromoendoscopy. The 30-day complication rate of colonoscopy is low, ranging from 1 to 5 per 1000 examinations. There is debate on the adequate training required before someone is competent to independently perform colonoscopy, and inadequate documentation following the procedure is common. PillCam endoscopy is most commonly employed for patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding or in the search for other small bowel pathology, such as insipient tumors, polyposis syndromes, or Crohn’s disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davis, K., & Valente, M. A. (2016). Endoscopy. In The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery (pp. 45–77). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25970-3_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free