Judging covers

16Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Cover versions form a loose but identifiable category of tracks and performances. We distinguish four kinds of covers and argue that they mark important differences in the modes of evaluation that are possible or appropriate for each: mimic covers, which aim merely to echo the canonical track; rendition covers, which change the sound of the canonical track; transformative covers, which diverge so much as to instantiate a distinct, albeit derivative song; and referential covers, which not only instantiate a distinct song, but for which the new song is in part about the original song. In order to allow for the very possibility of transformative and referential covers, we argue that a cover is characterized by relation to a canonical track rather than merely by being a new instance of a song that had been recorded previously. © 2013 The American Society for Aesthetics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magnus, C., Magnus, P. D., & Mag Uidhir, C. (2013). Judging covers. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 71(4), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free