Smoking and serum Vitamin D in older Chinese people: Cross-sectional analysis based on the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study

31Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective Studies on serum vitamin D in smokers showed conflicting results. We examined the association of smoking status with serum vitamin D in older Chinese men, taking advantage of a community-based sample with natural exposure to vitamin D. Design Cross-sectional study based on the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study (GBCS). Setting Community-based sample from the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study. Participants 612 male participants aged 50+years recruited from 2009 to 2011. Results The mean (SD) of vitamin D concentration was 58.3 (17.2), 57.0 (15.0) and 54.7 (15.4) nmol/L for never, former and current smokers, respectively. Adjusted for multiple confounders, vitamin D decreased from never to former, then to current smokers (P for trend 0.02). Compared to never smokers, current smokers had lower serum concentrations of vitamin D, and the concentrations decreased with the increasing number of cigarettes per day (-3.11 (95% CI -9.05 to 2.82), -3.29 (-8.3 to 1.72) and -4.61 (-8.89 to -0.33) for 1-9, 10-19 and 20+cigarettes per day, respectively; p for trend 0.01), duration of smoking (-1.39 (-6.09 to 3.30) and -5.39 (-9.42 to -1.35) for 1-39 and 40+years, respectively; p for trend 0.008) as well as pack-years (-2.89 (-6.78 to 1.01) and -5.58 (-10.48 to -0.67) for 1-39 and 40+pack-years, respectively; p for trend 0.009). Longer duration of quitting smoking was associated with higher vitamin D than was current smoking (P for trend 0.04). Conclusions Current smokers had lower vitamin D than never smokers, and the association showed a dose-response pattern.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jiang, C. Q., Chan, Y. H., Xu, L., Jin, Y. L., Zhu, T., Zhang, W. S., … Lam, T. H. (2016). Smoking and serum Vitamin D in older Chinese people: Cross-sectional analysis based on the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study. BMJ Open, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010946

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free