Horizontal stratification of higher education: The relative importance of field of study, institution, and department for candidates' wages

32Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Studies typically find large variation in labor market outcomes not only between educational levels, but also among individuals with a higher education. However, the importance of different types of horizontal divisions in higher education is mostly treated in separate literatures. In this paper, we use multilevel models and an outcome-based approach to investigate the relative importance of institution (college), department, and field of study in the Norwegian labor market. We find that the effects of field of study on wages are generally strong. The overall effects of institution are also quite large, but they emerge to a considerable extent at the level of departments; the effects of institution over and above the effects of department are small. We also show that the effects of horizontal divisions are greater at the graduate than at the undergraduate level, and that the effects of horizontal divisions increase over individuals' work careers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Borgen, N. T., & Mastekaasa, A. (2018). Horizontal stratification of higher education: The relative importance of field of study, institution, and department for candidates’ wages. Social Forces, 97(2), 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy075

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free