Interactive oral assessment: Staff perceptions, challenges and benefits of this robust, authentic assessment design approach

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper aims to share outputs from a Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI) Transforming Assessment funded project. The objective of the project was to explore the impact of Interactive Oral Assessment (IO) at Dublin City University (DCU). Griffith University, Australia, pioneered IOs in their university in 2016 and has evidence to support their success in promoting academic integrity, engaging students and preparing them professionally. DCU introduced IOs in 2020 with the support of Griffith University. Initial research findings demonstrated that IOs were received favourably by students in DCU. This paper shares findings into the experience of academics using IOs, and presents underpinning relevant literature. The review covers the application and value of IOs, and IO planning and implementation. Research analysis of academic in-depth interviews shares the benefits and motivation for using IOs, along with the challenges, and supports required to ensure successful IO practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Riordan, F., Thangaraj, J., Girme, P., & Ward, M. (2026). Interactive oral assessment: Staff perceptions, challenges and benefits of this robust, authentic assessment design approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 63(2), 494–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2477160

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free