Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) in small bowel Crohn's disease (SBCD) has been studied in many clinical trials and has been shown to be superior to other modalities (eg, barium radiography, colonoscopy with ileoscopy, computed tomography enterography, push enteroscopy) for diagnosing and evaluating non-stricturing SBCD. There have been concerns about the risk of capsule retention in SBCD because of small bowel strictures, with reported capsule retention rates in patients with known SBCD as high as 13% (range 4-13). Our purpose is to demonstrate the safety of WCE in patients with known or suspected SBCD in our community based, private practice that specializes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHOD(S): We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with confirmed SBCD who had undergone WCE between 2001 and 2013. Patients with documented bowel obstruction; radiographic or endoscopic evidence of strictures <1 cm in diameter; history of bowel obstruction, stenotic surgical hookups, or intestinal scarring were excluded from undergoing WCE per facility protocol. All patients had either a computed tomographic enterography, magnetic resonance enterography or small bowel follow-through in addition to careful prescreening history and physical exam to evaluate for WCE exclusion criteria prior to any capsule swallow. RESULT(S): Ninety eight patients with confirmed SBCD underwent WCE and were included in the study; 43% (n = 42) males, 57% (n = 56) females with a mean age of 42, and mean disease duration of 7.49 years (range <1-46). Thirty five patients (36%) had CD for
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Shafran, I., Burgunder, P., Kwa, M., & Nadar, K. (2013). P-082 Community Experience with Capsule Endoscopy in 98 Patients with Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 19, S58. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mib.0000438761.52673.22
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.