DOP067 Treatment discontinuation, flares and hospitalisations among biologic-naïve patients with IBD over the first year of treatment: a comparative effectiveness study of vedolizumab vs. infliximab

  • Raluy-Callado M
  • Berger A
  • Khalid J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Current inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment guidelines recommend the gut-selective anti-integrin antibody vedolizumab (VDZ) for treatment of patients with moderately to severely active disease who have had an inadequate response with, lost response to, or were intolerant to a tumour necrosis factor antagonist such as infliximab (IFX). We evaluated clinical outcomes of VDZ vs. IFX over the first year of treatment to assess their effectiveness as initial therapy. Method(s): Biologic-naive patients with IBD who initiated VDZ or IFX treatment between May 2014 and April 2017 were identified from the Explorys Universe database. Patients included were aged >=18 years and had: >=365 days of medical history at index date (date of the first infusion); >=188 days of follow-up; successfully completed the induction phase and moved to maintenance therapy (>=3 infusions

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raluy-Callado, M., Berger, A., Khalid, J. M., & Patel, H. (2018). DOP067 Treatment discontinuation, flares and hospitalisations among biologic-naïve patients with IBD over the first year of treatment: a comparative effectiveness study of vedolizumab vs. infliximab. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, 12(supplement_1), S076–S076. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx180.104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free