Tying in two-sided markets with multi-homing

144Citations
Citations of this article
227Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effects of tying on market competition and social welfare in two-sided markets when economic agents can engage in multi-homing by participating in multiple platforms to reap maximal network benefits. The model shows that tying induces more consumers to multi-home and makes platform-specific exclusive content available to more consumers, which is beneficial to content providers. As a result, tying can be welfare-enhancing if multi-homing is allowed, even in cases where its welfare impacts are negative in the absence of multi-homing. The analysis thus can have important implications for recent antitrust cases in industries where multi-homing is prevalent. © 2010 The Author. The Journal of Industrial Economics © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. and the Editorial Board of The Journal of Industrial Economics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Choi, J. P. (2010). Tying in two-sided markets with multi-homing. Journal of Industrial Economics, 58(3), 607–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00426.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free