The relationship of adverse childhood experiences of pregnant women with healthy lifestyle behaviours and birth attitudes: A cross-sectional study

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction This study was conducted to determine the relationship between negative childhood experiences of pregnant women and health-promoting lifestyle behaviours and childbirth attitudes. Methods The cross-sectional study was conducted with 468 pregnant women between March 2023 and January 2024. Data were collected using a descriptive characteristics form, an adverse childhood experiences questionnaire (ACEQ), a health-promoting lifestyle profile (HPLP-II), and a childbirth attitude questionnaire (CAQ). The study reporting followed the STROBE checklist. Results Participants’ mean scores were as follows: ACEQ 1.10±1.84, CAQ 39.91±12.18, and HPLP-II 138.64±23.71. Linear regression analysis showed that HPLP-II scores were significantly lower in non-employed women (β=−0.194; 95% CI: −14.06, −5.44; p=0.000) and smokers (β=−0.104; 95% CI: −12.05, −1.05; p=0.020). Lower income perception was significantly associated with decreased HPLP-II scores (β=−0.170; 95% CI: −11.34 to −3.48; p=0.000). Additionally, higher ACEQ scores were also significantly related to lower HPLP-II scores (β=−0.092; 95% CI: −2.29 to −0.06; p=0.037). Regarding CAQ, scores were significantly higher among participants with lower income perception (β=−0.200; 95% CI: −6.35, −2.59; p=0.000), those who consumed alcohol during pregnancy (β=−0.322; 95% CI: −16.36, −9.70; p=0.000), and those with higher ACEQ scores (β=0.158; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.58; p=0.000). Discussion Pregnant women’s negative childhood experiences affect both birth anxiety and health-promoting lifestyle behaviours.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cevik, E., & Karaca, P. P. (2026). The relationship of adverse childhood experiences of pregnant women with healthy lifestyle behaviours and birth attitudes: A cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE, 21(2 February). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341601

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free