Critical appraisal of meta-analyses: an introductory guide for the practicing surgeon

  • Lawrentschuk N
  • McCall J
  • Güller U
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Meta-analyses are an essential tool of clinical research. Meta-analyses of individual randomized controlled trials frequently constitute the highest possible level of scientific evidence for a given research question and allow surgeons to rapidly gain a comprehensive understanding of an important clinical issue. Moreover, meta-analyses often serve as cornerstones for evidence-based surgery, treatment guidelines, and knowledge transfer. Given the importance of meta-analyses to the medical (and surgical) knowledge base, it is of cardinal importance that surgeons have a basic grasp of the principles that guide a high-quality meta-analysis, and be able to weigh objectively the advantages and potential pitfalls of this clinical research tool. Unfortunately, surgeons are often ill-prepared to successfully conduct, critically appraise, and correctly interpret meta-analyses. The objective of this educational review is to provide surgeons with a brief introductory overview of the knowledge and skills required for understanding and critically appraising surgical meta-analyses as well as assessing their implications for their own surgical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lawrentschuk, N., McCall, J., & Güller, U. (2009). Critical appraisal of meta-analyses: an introductory guide for the practicing surgeon. Patient Safety in Surgery, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free