Abstract
In the article, the variable called the number of Pairs In the Paired condition (PIP) was mischaracterized, though the main conclusions are not altered. The incorrect PIP measure included in the publication was the number of pairs scored based on single items cued recalled from List 1 and List 2 under the single list recall condition, not the number of pairs recalled under the paired condition. Reanalysis was performed. On page 1588, the baseline PIP values should be corrected in Table 1 (corrected Table 1 included below, the corrected numbers are in bold font). The last sentence in the main text on Page 1590, left panel, which was: "Binding measure PIP was predictive using cut-scores of 8 and 9 (p≤0.01) but not predictive using the cut-scores of 10 and 11 (p = 0.07 and 0.51, respectively)". Should instead read: "Binding measure PIPwas predictive using cut-scores of 6 (p = 0.03) and 7 (p = 0.006) but not predictive using the cut-scores of 8, 9, 10 and 11 (p > 0.10)". Supplemental Tables 2, 3, 4, 5 and 8 were also revised (the revised supplemental file is available with the original article as published in the journal). (Table Presented).
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Erratum: Memory binding test predicts incident amnestic mild cognitive impairment (Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease (2016) 53:4 (1585-1595) DOI: 10.3233/JAD-160291). (2017). Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-179003
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.