Clinical and Model-Based Evaluation of the Effect of Glasdegib on Cardiac Repolarization From a Randomized Thorough QT Study

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Glasdegib is a potent, selective oral inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. This phase 1 double-blind thorough QT study (NCT03162900) evaluated the effects of glasdegib on QTc interval. The study enrolled 36 healthy volunteers to receive a single dose of 150 mg glasdegib (representing a therapeutic dose), 300 mg glasdegib (representing a supratherapeutic dose), 400 mg moxifloxacin (positive control), or placebo under fasted conditions. The study demonstrated that therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of glasdegib had no significant effect on QTc interval; the upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for all time-matched least-squares mean differences in QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) between glasdegib and placebo was below the prespecified criterion of 20 milliseconds (Food and Drug Administration correspondence reviewed and accepted). Based on an exposure–response analysis, glasdegib was determined not to have a meaningful effect on heart rate (change in RR interval). The mean (90%CI) model-derived baseline and placebo-adjusted QTcF at the average maximum observed concentration values corresponding to therapeutic and supratherapeutic glasdegib doses was 7.3 milliseconds (6.5-8.2 milliseconds) and 13.7 milliseconds (12.0-15.5 milliseconds), respectively. Together these results demonstrated that following therapeutic and supratherapeutic glasdegib dosing, the change in QTc from baseline was well below the 20-millisecond threshold of clinical concern in oncology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Masters, J. C., Shaik, N., Mendes da Costa, L., Hee, B., & LaBadie, R. R. (2021). Clinical and Model-Based Evaluation of the Effect of Glasdegib on Cardiac Repolarization From a Randomized Thorough QT Study. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development, 10(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.862

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free