Animals, Angelenos, and the Arbitrary Analyzing Human-Wildlife Entanglement in Los Angeles

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Multispecies entanglement has been a major research focus in environmental humanities, aiming to rethink ontological and ethical possibilities, especially in urban settings, by attending to speculative other-than-human futures. This article dwells on already existing entanglements of multiple species of animals in Los Angeles, using empirical data (conversations from the social media platform Nextdoor) to describe these entanglements according to a fourfold framework-spatial, emotional, behavioral, and political. Drawing on the political philosophy of nondomination, it argues that existing entanglements are primarily arbitrary in a political sense, and that moving beyond them will require reducing this arbitrariness, even it if it means restricting human freedom or introducing new forms of control over animals, for a more-than-human city to be just.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Altrudi, S., & KELTY, C. M. (2022). Animals, Angelenos, and the Arbitrary Analyzing Human-Wildlife Entanglement in Los Angeles. Environmental Humanities, 14(3), 522–542. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9962838

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free