Lung Function Trajectories in Mild COVID-19 With 2-year Follow-up

12Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. The long-term pulmonary sequelae of mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to characterize lung function trajectories in individuals with mild COVID-19 from preinfection to 2 years postinfection. Methods. We reinvited participants 2 years after infection from our matched cohort study of the Copenhagen General Population who had initially been examined 5.4 months after infection. We repeated lung tests and questionnaires. Linear mixed models were used to estimate dynamics in lung volumes in individuals with COVID-19 patients versus uninfected controls over two intervals: from preinfection to 6 months postinfection and 6 months postinfection to 2 years postinfection. Results. 52 individuals (48.6%) attended the 2-year examination at median 1.9 years (interquartile range, 1.8–2.4) after COVID-19, all with mild infection. Individuals with COVID-19 had an adjusted excess decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 13.0 mL per year (95% confidence interval [CI], −23.5 to −2.5; P = .02) from before infection to 6 months after infection compared to uninfected controls. From 6 to 24 months after infection, they had an excess decline of 7.5 mL per year (95% CI, −25.6–9.6; P = .40). A similar pattern was observed for forced vital capacity (FVC). Participants had a mean increase in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) of 3.33 (SD 7.97) between the 6- and 24-month examination. Conclusions. Our results indicate that mild COVID-19 infection affects lung function at the time of infection with limited recovery 2 years after infection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iversen, K. K., Ronit, A., Ahlström, M. G., Nordestgaard, B. G., Afzal, S., & Benfield, T. (2024). Lung Function Trajectories in Mild COVID-19 With 2-year Follow-up. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 229(6), 1750–1758. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free