Abstract
Background: Aquafol, a microemulsion propofol, causes more severe and frequent pain on injection than propofol. The purpose of this study was to compare a combination of lidocaine and ketamine on aquafol-induced pain with lidocaine or ketamine alone during the induction of anesthesia. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 130 healthy patients who were undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. The patients received IV lidocaine 40 mg plus ketamine 25 mg (Group LK, n = 43), lidocaine 40 mg (Group L, n = 42), or ketamine 25 mg (Group K, n = 45) with a rubber tourniquet on the forearm 1 min before the injection of microemulsion propofol. The pain score was assessed by a 4-point verbal rating scale (VRS) at 10 seconds after injection of microemulsion propofol 30 mg and during the injection of the remaining total dose. Results: The incidence and severity of pain was significantly lower in Group LK than Group L or Group K at 10 seconds after the injection of microemulsion propofol 30 mg (P < 0.05). And the incidence and severity of pain was significantly lower in Group LK and Group K than Group L during the injection of the remaining total dose (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Pretreatment with IV lidocaine 40 mg plus ketamine 25 mg with a rubber tourniquet on the forearm 1 min before the injection of microemulsion propofol is more effective than lidocaine 40 mg or ketamine 25 mg alone in preventing pain from the injection of microemulsion propofol. Copyright © Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2010.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hwang, I., Noh, J. I., Kim, S. I., Kim, M. G., Park, S. Y., Kim, S. H., & Ok, S. Y. (2010). Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: A comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 59(4), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.4.233
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.