Evidence-based management of primary angle closure glaucoma

48Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the classification of primary angle closure (PAC) and discuss the evidence-based management of each type. RECENT FINDINGS: There is limited evidence to support the prophylactic treatment of primary angle closure suspects. Cataract and clear lens extraction may be more effective than traditional therapy in controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with PAC, primary angle closure glaucoma, and acute angle closure crisis. SUMMARY: Treatment of angle closure depends on the signs of chronic angle damage and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. In the absence of such evidence, serial gonioscopy may be the preferred therapy. If signs or symptoms are present, medical therapy and laser peripheral iridotomy are beneficial. However, recent data suggest that cataract extraction may be more effective at controlling the IOP than laser or incisional glaucoma procedures. © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Emanuel, M. E., Parrish, R. K., & Gedde, S. J. (2014, March). Evidence-based management of primary angle closure glaucoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free