Robotic anatomic pulmonary segmentectomy: Technical approach and outcomes

7Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To report our initial experience with pulmonary robotic segmentectomy, describing the surgical technique, the preferred positioning of portals, initial results and outcomes. Methods: We collected data, from a prospective robotic surgery database, on patients undergoing robotic segmentectomy between January 2017 and December 2018. All patients had lung cancer, primary or secondary, or benign diseases, and were operated on with the Da Vinci system, by the three portals technique plus one utilitarian incision of 3cm. We dissected the hilar structures individually and performed the ligatures of the arterial and venous branches, of the segmental bronchi, as well as a parenchymal transection, with endoscopic staplers. We carried out systematic dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Results: Forty-nine patients, of whom 33 were women, underwent robotic segmentectomy. The average age was of 68 years. Most patients had NSCLC (n=34), followed by metastatic disease (n=11) and benign disease (n=4). There was no conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery, or to lobectomy. The median total operative time was 160 minutes, and the median console time, 117 minutes. Postoperative complications occurred in nine patients (18.3%), of whom seven (14.2%) had prolonged hospitalization (>7 days) due to persistent air fistula (n=4; 8.1%) or abdominal complications (n=2.4%). Conclusion: Robotic segmentectomy is a safe and viable procedure, offering a short period of hospitalization and low morbidity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Terra, R. M., Lauricella, L. L., Haddad, R., De-Campos, J. R. M., Nabuco-De-Araujo, P. H. X., Lima, C. E. T., … Pego-Fernandes, P. M. (2019). Robotic anatomic pulmonary segmentectomy: Technical approach and outcomes. Revista Do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20192210

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free