High accuracy of proximity extension assay technology for the quantification of plasma brain natriuretic peptide

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Novel multiplex assays allow the simultaneous identification of a large number of plasma proteins. While these new technologies have been shown to be highly sensitive and accurate for the identification of plasma proteins, the use of this technology to quantify those proteins has not been properly investigated. In this pilot study, we tested the accuracy of the proximity extension assay (PEA) for the quantification of the cardiac biomarker brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) compared to a standard clinically approved method. Methods: Concentrations of BNP were assessed in 120 plasma samples from 30 patients with PEA and compared to chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA). Venous blood samples were collected from in tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, centrifuged within 6 hours at 3,500 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C, frozen and stored at −80°C until analyzed. Correlation between the CMIA and PEA techniques was tested using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rho) and the agreement was described with a Bland-Altman plot. Results: Brain natriuretic peptide values obtained by CMIA and PEA were highly correlated (Spearman’s rho = 0.865, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arrigo, M., Vodovar, N., Von Moos, S., Masson, E., Segerer, S., Cippà, P. E., & Mebazaa, A. (2018). High accuracy of proximity extension assay technology for the quantification of plasma brain natriuretic peptide. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 32(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22574

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free