Abstract
We compared 3 rapid assays for Clostridium difficile with a cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA). Of 600 stool samples, 46 were positive for toxigenic C difficile. Both rapid common antigen assays were highly sensitive (91.3%-100%) and, therefore, were appropriate screening tests. The rapid toxin assay had poor sensitivity (61%) but excellent specificity (99.3%). Testing stools for glutamate dehydrogenase (step 1) and those positive with a rapid toxin assay (step 2) would correctly classify 81% of submitted specimens within 2 hours, including during periods of limited staffing (evenings, nights, and weekends). CCNA could then be used as a third step to test rapid toxin-negative samples, thereby providing a final result for the remaining 19% of samples by 48 to 72 hours. The use of rapid assays as outlined could enhance timely diagnosis of C difficile. © American Society for Clinical Pathology.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Reller, M. E., Alcabasa, R. C., Lema, C. A., & Carroll, K. C. (2010). Comparison of two rapid assays for Clostridium difficile common antigen and a C difficile toxin A/B assay with the cell culture neutralization assay. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 133(1), 107–109. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPO3QWOU8CYGEU
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.