Role of stormflow in reducing N retention in a suburban forested watershed, western Japan

28Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To evaluate the role of stormflow in reducing N retention in forested watersheds, we investigated the inorganic N budget of a Japanese suburban forested watershed for 4 years where the proportion of direct flow to precipitation is considerably high (mean is 33%; range is 25-42%). Soil net N mineralization and net nitrification were also measured at middle and lower positions of a slope within the watershed to evaluate nitrate (NO 3-) pool size. Annual mean N deposition via throughfall plus stemflow was 15.5 kg N ha-1 yr-1 (13.6-17.1 kg N ha-1 yr-1), which exceeded the threshold value to potentially induce N leaching from forested watersheds. Net nitrification at the middle position was comparable with the lower position. This suggests that the NO3- rich area is large, which could be partly caused by comparable soil moisture conditions with the lower position due to rising groundwater levels during storm events. Annual mean N export was 10.4 kg N ha-1 yr-1 (7.8-12.5 kg N ha-1 yr-1), and subsequent N retention was distinctly low 33% (12-53%). Stormflow accounted for more than 80% of total annual N export. Furthermore, N retention was lower (12 and 27%) in years with higher proportions of direct flow than in years with lower proportions (36 and 53%). Therefore, stormflow is a significant factor in reducing N retention in forested watersheds. The effect of stormflow observation on the comparison of N budgets in other watersheds with different climate and/or hydrologic conditions is discussed. Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chiwa, M., Maruno, R., Ide, J., Miyano, T., Higashi, N., & Otsuki, K. (2010). Role of stormflow in reducing N retention in a suburban forested watershed, western Japan. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 115(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JG000944

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free