Food and Nutrition Systems Dashboards: A Systematic Review

21Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The rapid expansion of food and nutrition information requires new ways of data sharing and dissemination. Interactive platforms integrating data portals and visualization dashboards have been effectively utilized to describe, monitor, and track information related to food and nutrition; however, a comprehensive evaluation of emerging interactive systems is lacking. We conducted a systematic review on publicly available dashboards using a set of 48 evaluation metrics for data integrity, completeness, granularity, visualization quality, and interactivity based on 4 major principles: evidence, efficiency, emphasis, and ethics. We evaluated 13 dashboards, summarized their characteristics, strengths, and limitations, and provided guidelines for developing nutrition dashboards. We applied mixed effects models to summarize evaluation results adjusted for interrater variability. The proposed metrics and evaluation principles help to improve data standardization and harmonization, dashboard performance and usability, broaden information and knowledge sharing among researchers, practitioners, and decision makers in the field of food and nutrition, and accelerate data literacy and communication.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, B., Liang, S., Monahan, K. M., Singh, G. M., Simpson, R. B., Reedy, J., … Naumova, E. N. (2022, May 1). Food and Nutrition Systems Dashboards: A Systematic Review. Advances in Nutrition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmac022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free