Building the evidence on simulation validity: Comparison of anesthesiologists' communication patterns in real and simulated cases

40Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Effective teamwork is important for patient safety, and verbal communication underpins many dimensions of teamwork. The validity of the simulated environment would be supported if it elicited similar verbal communications to the real setting. The authors hypothesized that anesthesiologists would exhibit similar verbal communication patterns in routine operating room (OR) cases and routine simulated cases. The authors further hypothesized that anesthesiologists would exhibit different communication patterns in routine cases (real or simulated) and simulated cases involving a crisis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weller, J., Henderson, R., Webster, C. S., Shulruf, B., Torrie, J., Davies, E., … Merry, A. F. (2014). Building the evidence on simulation validity: Comparison of anesthesiologists’ communication patterns in real and simulated cases. Anesthesiology, 120(1), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a44bc5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free