Does boundary distinguish complexities?

37Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recently, Chapman et al. argued that holographic complexities for defects distinguish action from volume. Motivated by their work, we study complexity of quantum states in conformal field theory with boundary. In generic two-dimensional BCFT, we work on the path-integral optimization which gives one of field-theoretic definitions for the complexity. We also perform holographic computations of the complexity in Takayanagi’s AdS/BCFT model following by the “complexity = volume” conjecture and “complexity = action” conjecture. We find that increments of the complexity due to the boundary show the same divergent structures in these models except for the CA complexity in the AdS3/BCFT2 model as the argument by Chapman et al. Thus, we conclude that boundary does not distinguish the complexities in general.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sato, Y., & Watanabe, K. (2019). Does boundary distinguish complexities? Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2019)132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free